Parallel Economies
Science & Tech • Business • Culture
Join the Parallel Economies community to discover and share businesses that support Constitutional conservative values. We will be highlighting companies that do not censor American citizens and uphold their Constitutional rights. Join our community and let's build a Parallel Economy together!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Facebook’s Midterm Strategy – Fact-Checking and Censorship

Election day is coming, and that means it’s time once again to clamp down on free speech. Facebook recently announced that any news or statements regarding the coming elections will be vetted by a bevy of associated fact-checkers and that new political ads will be prohibited. The social media giant’s 2022 midterm strategy bears a striking resemblance to the 2020 plan: fact-checking and censorship.

The Midterm Strategy
Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, announced increased security measures ahead of the midterms, promising to remove misinformation about election dates, voting locations, voter eligibility, and election outcomes. Content that incites violence will also be taken down, as will harassment, hate speech, and ads that discourage voting or challenge the legitimacy of the results. Any election-related post will be labeled according to the findings of the fact-checkers, though the labels will become more targeted, according to the company.

In 2020 – the first year Facebook employed such election-time measures – the platform “displayed warnings on more than 150 million pieces of content” the fact-checkers took issue with and employed digital tools to block access to unwanted content like hate speech. But what did such content include – and what might count now in 2022?

A Look Back
Any new political or issue-based ads were banned from October 27, 2020, until after the elections – and that moratorium was extended as the results were called into question. Even in the months leading up to the big day, Donald Trump and other Republicans explained their concern that mail-in ballots were vulnerable and that a party willing to cheat could easily enough manufacture extras to tilt the scales in its direction. Liberty Nation’s Laura Valkovic asked in 2020 regarding the prohibition, “Is this a direct response to Trump and other Republican claims that widespread mail-in voting is vulnerable to corruption – and is the company reacting to political pressure?”

Following an open letter to CEO Mark Zuckerberg from Jen O’Malley Dillon, Joe Biden’s campaign manager, Facebook banned ads that “delegitimized any lawful method or process of voting.” It seemed to many to be a push back against very worthwhile questions from the right. Fast forward to the summer of 2021, and one saw Facebook and the White House cooperating to flag “problematic” posts that spread “misinformation” about the pandemic and vaccinations – that is, anything that contradicted or even questioned the state-approved narrative.

A Fair Shake for All?
Facebook banned Donald Trump after claiming his words on January 6, 2021, incited violence in breach of the company’s community standards. And even if the former president declares his candidacy for 2024, the platform has said it wouldn’t rush a decision on whether to reinstate his account – much less guarantee that he would be allowed back at all.

In 2018, Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) delivered a call to action against the Trump administration that sure sounded a lot like inciting violence. “If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd,” she proclaimed. “And you push back on them. Tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere!” Later, in 2021, Rep. Waters demanded a guilty verdict for Derek Chauvin, the police officer who killed George Floyd – but she didn’t stop there. “I’m going to fight with all the people who stand for justice,” she said, should the trial not go her way. “We’ve got to stand on the street and we’ve got to get more active. We’ve got to get more confrontational.”

Waters’ statements over the last few years have been no less inciteful and violent than the former president’s, and yet she remains on Facebook. Still, even if he throws his hat in the ring again before November, the platform’s midterm strategy has no room for Donald Trump. Is that balanced?

Would other Republicans, conservatives, and non-progressives in general get a fair shake? To answer that, one need merely look back to the 2020 election and the entirety of the pandemic panic. Soon, the days will begin to grow cooler, pumpkin spice will fill the air, campaign signs will spring up on lawns and roadsides, and conservative social media users will find themselves in Facebook jail. Brace yourself; election day is coming.

https://www.libertynation.com/facebooks-midterm-strategy-fact-checking-and-censorship/

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
October 27, 2023
Katt's Remedies
00:00:31
My Thoughts About The FTX / Democrat Money Laundering Scheme

I saw a tweet this morning that really opened my eyes to something that not enough people are talking about that is related to this FTX scandal. In this video I give a little bit of backstory for anyone who isn’t following the FTX situation, and then dive into what this tweet said and my thoughts about it.

00:09:19
Major Anti-censorship Update From Texas

Good afternoon Patriots! I just wanted to share some really good news out of Texas regarding their social media anti-censorship law. According to an article on ReclaimTheNet, the law was just upheld by the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. I wanted to make a quick video on this because the judge in this article made an argument that I haven’t seen before regarding Section 230 protections and their implications for censorship.

00:07:34
Texas Anti Censorship Law HB 20

In this podcast, I discuss the Texas Social Media Anti Censorship Law, HB 20. I talk about what it is, what it does, and give some of my thoughts about it. I actually live streamed the recording of the podcast earlier.

Texas Anti Censorship Law HB 20
Podcast: Tech Pundits React to Elon's Purchase of Twitter

Good evening, Patriots!

OK, ok... We've all heard the talking heads crying about Elon buying Twitter. However, that's not what this week's podcast is about. I decided to give you all the arguments that liberal tech news "journalists" are making about Elon buying Twitter. It's a somewhat different take than you may have heard elsewhere. You may find that people who report on the tech news space have a bit of a different perspective on this from the folks that focus on CRT / wokeness all day long.

This is the kind of perspective you're not likely to get elsewhere because most people who report on tech news are full blown socialists. So, I hope you enjoy this episode!

God bless!

Noah

P.S. Please search for the podcast in your podcast player of choice and subscribe. That way you will have future episodes delivered right to your phone. THANKS!

Podcast: Tech Pundits React to Elon's Purchase of Twitter
Parallel Economies Podcast Episode 1

Good evening / morning, Patriots!!

OK, I finally published episode 1 of the podcast. Please don't judge me too harshly. 😉 Hopefully, I'll get better with some experience. In this episode, I talk about Elon Musk's decision to turn down the board seat at Twitter, as well as TRUTH Social's CEO, Devin Nunes responding to a number of articles claiming that TRUTH Social has failed already. BTW, there's also a bit of breaking news in here, about the release date of the TRUTH Social Web App. The episode is just over 13 minutes long. Hopefully it came out, OK. I literally just finished exporting it. I hope you like it. ;-)

I'm off to bed!!!

Noah

Parallel Economies Podcast Episode 1

If deer or squirrel are invading your yard fight back. Based American company with new products for the parallel economy. Enjoy FREE SHIPPING for a limited time. https://www.buckstop.us/

post photo preview

What happened to paralleleconomies.com ??????

March 05, 2024

Your Giggles for Today

A guy calls 911 in a panic. “My wife is having a baby! Her contractions are only one minute apart!” “Calm down,” the 911 operator says. “Is this her first child?” “No, you idiot!” the guy shouts. “This is her husband!”

A little girl asks her mother, “How did the human race appear?” The mother answers, “Well, God made Adam and Eve and then they had kids. So all mankind was made.” Two days later the little girl asks her father the exact same question. The father answers, “Many years ago, there were monkeys from which the entire human race evolved.” The confused little girl returns to her mother and says, “Mom, you told me the human race was created by God, and Dad said man developed from monkeys. Why do you have different stories?” The mother answers, “Well, I was referring to my side of the family and your dad was talking about his side.” (Lol! A oldie that needed repeating).

“When my parents got divorced, there was a custody fight over me . ....

post photo preview
PayPal shuts account of group who fought to keep schools open during pandemic
Another casualty of the recent PayPal purge.

UsForThem, a UK parents’ group that campaigned to keep schools open during the pandemic, has been banned from PayPal because of “the nature of its activities.” The group says that after the ban, it is unable to access thousands of pounds in donations.

reclaim-2022-09-23-at-00.08.02.png

“We were completely taken aback to learn that PayPal was discontinuing our services ‘due to the nature of [our] activities’. No prior warning or meaningful explanation was given, and despite them saying we could withdraw our remaining balance, we cannot,” said the group’s co-founder Molly Kingsley to The Telegraph.

“UsForThem has only ever been fully transparent about the organization’s aims, and our mission statement is on a prominent page of our website for all to read. That makes clear that our core focus is campaigning for children to be prioritized in public decision-making.

“If something about that mission offends PayPal, why could they not be transparent about that? For a small volunteer organization, this has a significant impact on our ability to operate, as presumably was intended.

“It is extremely hard not to draw the conclusion that this is a politically motivated cancellation of an organization that in some way offends PayPal.”

Toby Young, Free Speech Union’s founder, also claimed PayPal banned his account for political motives. The Free Speech Union’s account was also banned, as well as the account of the non-profit Gays Against Groomers.

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals